Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 3:57:50 GMT -5
The plenary session of the Fourth Chamber of the Supreme Court has issued a ruling confirming the decision of the National Court that declared the nullity of Ryanair 's second ERTE . The ruling considers the administrative decision of the Minister of Labor, Yolanda Díaz , to be in accordance with the law, who considered unjustified the concurrence of force majeure requested by the aforementioned company with respect to the workers who had been fired before the pandemic and whose dismissal had been declared void. . The Supreme Court considers that, in addition to defects in the procedure followed by the company due to the failure to notify the list of those affected to the union representatives, there was fraud of law given that the intention with the ERTE was that a large part of the salaries of processing that the company had to pay for the dismissal were paid by Social Security through unemployment benefits. It is not the first time that the Supreme Court has dealt a blow to the Irish company.
Last June, two Ryanair clauses were declared null and void as “abusive” following an appeal filed by the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU). JOB LABOR SUPREME RYANAIR ERTEestablished after the Second World War, life expectancy was much lower than today. Honestly, I believe that we are sooner rather than later in the position of opening the debate about extending the legal retirement age to years of age and it would be the logical thing to do since we would adapt the pace of work and our years of contributions to Australia Phone Number the longer life. longevity that we currently enjoy and the later incorporation into the labor market as a result of the greater time invested in a higher academic qualification with the hope of obtaining a greater economic return in future working life. Minister Escrivá is launching probe balloons in this sense, earning blows from the media and unions, but I believe that it continues to be an increasingly present future need. A no less trivial issue, and which is already the subject of debate, is the possibility of increasing.
The calculation of working life for the calculation of the pension from the current 25 years to 35 years, which was the other relevant point of the pension reform. Zapatero and that he is in the eye of the hurricane in the current reform project. On this matter I do not have a clear opinion, but so that readers can have some element of judgment, I comment on the following. In the past, working lives were staggered in such a way that it was logical to assume that as your experience increased, so did your salary and, therefore, your contribution, especially because the tendency was to stay in the same company for a large part of it. of your work life. Nowadays, it goes without saying that this is not the case. We people wander through various companies without great possibilities of settling down and consolidating our career path and, therefore, our emoluments. If we add to this the fact that the economic crises have made an appearance with special virulence, we observe that our contributions have decreased and increased without a linear order and.
Last June, two Ryanair clauses were declared null and void as “abusive” following an appeal filed by the Organization of Consumers and Users (OCU). JOB LABOR SUPREME RYANAIR ERTEestablished after the Second World War, life expectancy was much lower than today. Honestly, I believe that we are sooner rather than later in the position of opening the debate about extending the legal retirement age to years of age and it would be the logical thing to do since we would adapt the pace of work and our years of contributions to Australia Phone Number the longer life. longevity that we currently enjoy and the later incorporation into the labor market as a result of the greater time invested in a higher academic qualification with the hope of obtaining a greater economic return in future working life. Minister Escrivá is launching probe balloons in this sense, earning blows from the media and unions, but I believe that it continues to be an increasingly present future need. A no less trivial issue, and which is already the subject of debate, is the possibility of increasing.
The calculation of working life for the calculation of the pension from the current 25 years to 35 years, which was the other relevant point of the pension reform. Zapatero and that he is in the eye of the hurricane in the current reform project. On this matter I do not have a clear opinion, but so that readers can have some element of judgment, I comment on the following. In the past, working lives were staggered in such a way that it was logical to assume that as your experience increased, so did your salary and, therefore, your contribution, especially because the tendency was to stay in the same company for a large part of it. of your work life. Nowadays, it goes without saying that this is not the case. We people wander through various companies without great possibilities of settling down and consolidating our career path and, therefore, our emoluments. If we add to this the fact that the economic crises have made an appearance with special virulence, we observe that our contributions have decreased and increased without a linear order and.